首页> 外文OA文献 >In System Identification, Interval (and Fuzzy) Estimates Can Lead to Much Better Accuracy than the Traditional Statistical Ones: General Algorithm and Case Study
【2h】

In System Identification, Interval (and Fuzzy) Estimates Can Lead to Much Better Accuracy than the Traditional Statistical Ones: General Algorithm and Case Study

机译:在系统识别中,区间(和模糊)估计可以导致比传统统计更准确的精度:通用算法和案例研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In many real-life situations, we know the upper bound of the measurement errors, and we also know that the measurement error is the joint result of several independent small effects. In such cases, due to the Central Limit theorem, the corresponding probability distribution is close to Gaussian, so it seems reasonable to apply the standard Gaussian-based statistical techniques to process this data -- in particular, when we need to identify a system. Yes, in doing this, we ignore the information about the bounds, but since the probability of exceeding them is small, we do not expect this to make a big difference on the result. Surprisingly, it turns out that in some practical situations, we get a much more accurate estimates if we, vice versa, take into account the bounds -- and ignore all the information about the probabilities. In this paper, we explain the corresponding algorithms. and we show, on a practical example, that using this algorithm can indeed leave to a drastic improvement in estimation accuracy.
机译:在许多实际情况下,我们知道测量误差的上限,并且我们也知道测量误差是几个独立的小效应的共同结果。在这种情况下,由于中央极限定理,相应的概率分布接近高斯分布,因此应用基于高斯的标准统计技术来处理此数据似乎是合理的,尤其是在需要识别系统时。是的,这样做时,我们会忽略有关边界的信息,但是由于超出边界的可能性很小,因此我们并不希望这对结果有很大的影响。令人惊讶的是,事实证明,在某些实际情况下,如果我们将边界考虑在内(反之亦然),而忽略了有关概率的所有信息,我们将获得更准确的估计。在本文中,我们解释了相应的算法。在一个实际的例子中,我们证明了使用这种算法确实可以极大地提高估计精度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号